Casting a shadow over war zones? Hard truths about the ICC's efforts to deter wartime atrocities
In: Journal of human rights, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 94-108
ISSN: 1475-4843
8 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of human rights, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 94-108
ISSN: 1475-4843
In: International security, Band 44, Heft 3, S. 84-128
ISSN: 1531-4804
Advocates of wartime international criminal tribunals (ICTs) hope that such tribunals can deter combatant atrocities against civilians. Yet, more than twenty-five years after the establishment of the first wartime ICT—the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)—wartime ICTs' role in deterring such violence remains a matter of debate. Insights from criminology, as well as research on civil conflicts and international legal compliance, suggest that ICTs are most likely to deter government and rebel forces from committing atrocities against civilians when all three of the following conditions are present: (1) ICT officials have secured sufficient prosecutorial support, (2) combatant groups rely on support from liberal constituencies, and (3) combatant groups have centralized structures. Case studies of the ICTY's impact on fourteen combatant groups from the Yugoslav conflicts—combined with hundreds of field interviews with war veterans and others—confirm this prediction. The ICTY's record thus sheds important light on how and when contemporary wartime ICTs—including the International Criminal Court—might succeed in deterring combatant atrocities against civilians.
In: International security, Band 44, Heft 3, S. 84-128
ISSN: 0162-2889
World Affairs Online
In: APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 107, Heft 4, S. 737-779
ISSN: 2161-7953
The Community Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS Court) is an increasingly active and bold adjudicator of human rights. Since acquiring jurisdiction over human rights complaints in 2005, theECOWASCourt has issued numerous decisions condemning human rights violations by the member states of the Economic Community of West African States (Community). Among this Court's path-breaking cases are judgments against Niger for condoning modern forms of slavery and against Nigeria for impeding the right to free basic education for all children. TheECOWASCourt also has broad access and standing rules that permit individuals and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to bypass national courts and file suits directly with the Court. Although the Court is generally careful in the proof that it requires of complainants and in the remedies that it demands of governments, it has not shied away from politically courageous decisions, such as rulings against the Gambia for the torture of journalists and against Nigeria for failing to regulate multinational companies that have degraded the environment of the oil-rich Niger Delta.
In: 107 American Journal of International Law 737-779 (2013)
SSRN
In: American journal of international law, Band 107, Heft 4, S. 737-779
ISSN: 0002-9300
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of human rights, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 1-3
ISSN: 1475-4843